Skip to main content
Welcome Guest! You can not login or register.

Notification

Icon
Error


Poll Question : Should Cllrs be resident of 'Ward' they represent
Choice Votes Statistics
  YES
5
55 %
  NO
3
33 %
  long as there is tea and biscuits dont mind
1
11 %
(Poll is closed) Total 9 100%
Guests can't vote. Try login or register. The poll has expired.
2 Pages12>
Ward Councillors
hunsa
#1 Posted : 02 November 2007 18:53:49(UTC)
Rank: Advanced Member

Joined: 30/09/2007(UTC)
Posts: 226
Its a disgrace when you have Cllrs representing wards in which they don't live in it.

When they vote on important issues I bet their decisions are biased in favour of the actual area they actually live in.

Is it not about time the parties sorted this out there is plenty of choice from within the wards rather than selecting members who do not live in the actual ward.

If a member was voted out from one ward to stand in another surely it tells you they were no good in representing the local issues. Must be something wrong here when they are allowed to stand inanother ward. If one ward votes them out then they should stay out as they are only in it for themselves and only only toe the party line and don't do a good job representing the local people.

We don't want outsiders represnting the ward they don't live in

Lets have local people representing the local people and local issues.



weggis
#2 Posted : 02 November 2007 20:14:04(UTC)
Rank: Advanced Member

Joined: 04/07/2007(UTC)
Posts: 564
Location: Redbridge Eye
“Disgrace”? Disagree!

I have known both Conservative and Labour Councillors in Redbridge who have represented wards that they do not live in. They have done so with honour and integrity and have given excellent service to all their ward residents. I only exclude the Liberal Democrats because there are not so many and the ones that I do know represent the ward they live in.

This accolade does not however apply to all of them, nor does it apply to all those who live in the ward they represent or have represented.

As I recall the candidates registered residential address is printed on the ballot paper and if this is an issue for ward residents then they have the option to vote accordingly.
hunsa
#3 Posted : 02 November 2007 20:28:53(UTC)
Rank: Advanced Member

Joined: 30/09/2007(UTC)
Posts: 226
PS: The above poll is not aimed at any particular cllr living or dead, this is a general question to which i would be interested to hear both side. So please do not get offended and don't pick on any one particular cllr or ward.
BryanDicker
#4 Posted : 02 November 2007 22:28:10(UTC)
Rank: Advanced Member

Joined: 16/09/2007(UTC)
Posts: 874
I thought you had to be anyway. I know councils where they have to be resident of the ward for at least a year before they can stand
Guest
#5 Posted : 03 November 2007 10:08:02(UTC)
Rank: Member

Joined: 26/03/2007(UTC)
Posts: 284
I agree with this thread, I've stated before my opinion that Councillors should live in the ward they represent. This is local politics and our elected representatives should be in the community and understand the key issues. If you represent e.g. Goodmayes, you should live in Goodmayes not Chadwell Heath or Ilford.

On a seperate note, how come we have one MP to represent a big area e.g. Ilford North, but 3 councillors for smaller wards? I'm not necessarily critical of this, just wondered why...

BryanDicker
#6 Posted : 04 November 2007 17:25:32(UTC)
Rank: Advanced Member

Joined: 16/09/2007(UTC)
Posts: 874
Point- Where is our tea and biscuits?
hunsa
#8 Posted : 04 November 2007 22:05:02(UTC)
Rank: Advanced Member

Joined: 30/09/2007(UTC)
Posts: 226
More to the point what are all the local Cllrs doing, they don't seem to be doing much other than drinking tea and biscuits.

Might be waiting for another photo opportunity or maybe they need to don some overall and get a broom each and sweep the roads as no one else seems to be doing it.

Guest
#9 Posted : 05 November 2007 13:48:55(UTC)
Rank: Member

Joined: 26/03/2007(UTC)
Posts: 284
I have some sympathy with Councillors. Don't attack me!!!

Although I fervently disagree with the current administration and it's policies, the role of a Councillor (if performed properly) is a hard one - for all parties. For all intense and purposes they are volunteers who give up there evenings and weekends to help their local community. Not many of us would come home after a hard day at work and then go to the bear pit that can be some public meetings. There is also a big difference between the perception of what their powers are and what they can legally do. Granted across all the parties there are a couple of bad eggs / power hungry people, but I think this is still a minority. Perhaps I'm a idealist, I don't know.

annesevant
#11 Posted : 05 November 2007 15:29:17(UTC)
Rank: Advanced Member

Joined: 14/07/2007(UTC)
Posts: 975
Caoimghin, if you have been drinking something (or taken something) and it's legal, can I have some please?
annesevant
BryanDicker
#10 Posted : 05 November 2007 15:49:53(UTC)
Rank: Advanced Member

Joined: 16/09/2007(UTC)
Posts: 874
Caoimghin wrote:
I have some sympathy with Councillors. Don't attack me!!!

Although I fervently disagree with the current administration and it's policies, the role of a Councillor (if performed properly) is a hard one - for all parties. For all intense and purposes they are volunteers who give up there evenings and weekends to help their local community. Not many of us would come home after a hard day at work and then go to the bear pit that can be some public meetings. There is also a big difference between the perception of what their powers are and what they can legally do. Granted across all the parties there are a couple of bad eggs / power hungry people, but I think this is still a minority. Perhaps I'm a idealist, I don't know.



I wasnt attackingyou. I agree if the Cllr did their job properly, it would be a hard job. Are they volunteers? I thought they got some sort of income as a cllr, not just expenses? And yes they have to stick within the law, ESPECIALLY WITH REGARDS TO ALLOTMENTS!!!
Guest
#12 Posted : 05 November 2007 17:14:42(UTC)
Rank: Member

Joined: 26/03/2007(UTC)
Posts: 284
My understanding is that everyday councillors are only paid expenses. Only Cabinet members and the Leader of the Council draw a salary or in council speak an "additional allowance" too.
dopeyf
#13 Posted : 05 November 2007 17:16:12(UTC)
Rank: Advanced Member

Joined: 29/07/2007(UTC)
Posts: 554
The arguement as to whether Councillors should live in their ward, is a bit unreasonable, we all move at times and Councillors have the right to move as well for whatever reason, one would hope within the borough, but that is not always possible, now, should they resign if they move out of the borough is another question
cllrcleaver
#14 Posted : 05 November 2007 18:18:44(UTC)
Rank: Advanced Member

Joined: 16/04/2007(UTC)
Posts: 66
Council Members are entitled to claim a basic allowance (not all do) which works out to just under £10,000 per annum, i.e. a bit under the minimum wage so not enough to be a full time Councillor. From that I pay my own travel costs, telephone, postage etc. It is subject to tax and national insurance so the net receivable, depending on individual circumstances, is rather less than the total allowance.

Cabinet Members, Group Leaders and deputies and Committee Chairs and vice chairs can claim a Special Responsibility Allowance (SRA) which varies according to the job. The Leader of the Council gets the largest SRA but being the Leader is effectively a full time job. One of the bones of contention is the number of Councillors in Redbridge who can claim the SRA and the fact that most of the ruling group now have them.
hunsa
#15 Posted : 05 November 2007 19:40:41(UTC)
Rank: Advanced Member

Joined: 30/09/2007(UTC)
Posts: 226
Thanks Cllr Cleaver,

Its a job for for the boys, every committee you chair or sit or hold a portfolio you get a nice little earner. If it was performance related we would all be due a rebate.

Amazing they can find the money to pay themselves a hefty sum out of the council's coffers but when it comes to saving valuable services the message is there is never enough money available. I wonder if anyone gets any bonuses at end of each year after cuttting services or for any other reason? FOI needs to be asked.

Not suprised some people can afford to run a jag rather than using an 'Oyster card' like most prudent people. So you know who's getting the 'gravy'.
We should consider time limit for how long a cllr can serve that way people don't get too comfortable in their cushy little number. Are some past their sell by date.?
cllrcleaver
#16 Posted : 05 November 2007 23:15:34(UTC)
Rank: Advanced Member

Joined: 16/04/2007(UTC)
Posts: 66
No need for FOI. The Allowances are already available on this website. See:

http://www.redbridge.gov...members_allowances.aspx

under the Councillors section of Redbridge i.
BryanDicker
#17 Posted : 10 November 2007 05:19:27(UTC)
Rank: Advanced Member

Joined: 16/09/2007(UTC)
Posts: 874
Interesting read Cllr Cleaver, especially Clrr Weinberg's claims. Wow, I wish the public workers got that sort of money, and to think he might still have his full time job.
barkingside 21
#18 Posted : 14 November 2007 16:42:10(UTC)
Rank: Advanced Member

Joined: 21/08/2007(UTC)
Posts: 89
Location: Barkingside
The problem that the main parties have is that often their most able and willing candidates do not live in a ward that is "winnable" by their chosen party.
Morris Hickey
#19 Posted : 14 November 2007 17:18:53(UTC)
Rank: Advanced Member

Joined: 06/06/2007(UTC)
Posts: 1,399
Location: Too close to Redbridge-i censorship
The situation described by Barkingside 21 was precisely mine until 2002, and even then my party took only 2 of the 3 seats repeating that in 2006. Dopeyf in his posting of 5 November makes a very valid point. Whilst I think that I always tried my best for the ward that I represented at the time, one merit of not representing the ward where I live meant that nobody could accuse me with any justification of vested interest.
hunsa
#20 Posted : 14 November 2007 19:09:57(UTC)
Rank: Advanced Member

Joined: 30/09/2007(UTC)
Posts: 226
okay then why not have it that a person can stand in any ward in the borough they live in but he/she wants but after maximum of two terms they are out

some career politicans are milking the system to their advantage and well past the sell by date
Guest
#21 Posted : 14 November 2007 22:04:23(UTC)
Rank: Member

Joined: 26/03/2007(UTC)
Posts: 284
Likewise if Cllrs don't live in the ward they represent they could be accused of not caring or trying for the ward as it does not impact upon their lives. I do find the idea appealing that Cllrs should live in the ward they represent. Cllrs aren't MPs, they represent a smaller area, they are mean't to be local and crucially have a real feel for the area.
Rss Feed  Atom Feed
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages12>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.